Alger Hiss and J.
Edgar Hoover:
American
Heroes
By Tom
Milstein
When
Harry Truman became President of the United States, little did he know
that he had a Russian spy, Alger Hiss, looking over his shoulder as he tried to
conduct the nation’s foreign policy. Hiss was only the most prominent in a long
list of WASP traitors who have indulged in this nefarious activity, a few of
whom were sent to prison while their less ethnically favored tools, like the
Rosenbergs, went
to the electric chair. Was justice was served? After serving a short term for
perjury, Hiss had to spend the rest of his life selling ladies’ girdles and
office stationery. You decide.
Secretary of State Acheson raised a lot of
eyebrows when he “refus[ed] to turn his back on Alger Hiss” and quoted the New
Testament: “I was a Stranger and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me; I was
sick and ye visited me, I was in prison and ye came unto me."
The Hiss case opened the floodgates to a
swelling tide of revelations about Communist infiltration of the government
under the auspices of FDR’s New Deal. Americans were shocked to learn how their
mighty government had been turned into an agency of Stalin’s foreign policy by
trusted paragons of the Establishment. An entire generation was shamed. These
men were not mere careerists; they were dedicated Communist ideologues, prepared
to rationalize Stalin’s bloodiest crimes on behalf of a totalitarian
America.
How could this have happened? Hiss and his
comrades were not “sell-outs.” They were ideologues, sincerely committed to
their utopian vision of a Communist America and a united world order. They were
in no sense “premature anti-Fascists.” Those who from careerist motivations or
genuine moral revulsion repudiated their previous Communist convictions, were
shocked to find themselves the object of loathing by their own children who,
instead of adopting their parent’s new democratic idealism, embraced Mao’s
crusade to restore Stalinist purism.
But the question of totalitarian psychology
is of minor interest. The real issue is why America
tolerated this red fifth column for so long. Hoover’s FBI conducted a well-publicized
struggle against the Communist menace throughout this period. Even during times
of apparent Soviet-American amity the Agency kept itself well-apprised of
Communist activity. Few Americans were fooled by “Uncle Joe’s” smiles.
It therefore cannot be said that the
U.S. tolerated Communist subversion
out of ignorance or delusion. The obvious explanation is that the government was
conducting a deeply secret policy behind the backs of its own people, and that
the Communist Party was a tool of this policy. The manager of this tool had to
have been the FBI. Of course, Hoover didn’t keep his Party card in his bra.
FDR kept it in his desk drawer.
The secret policy on behalf of which
Hoover wielded his Communist apparat is even more obvious than its
mechanism: the Soviet-American alliance which eventually brought
America to world power.
20th Century history gives us all the answers we need. Without this
alliance, America might well have become the
world’s dominant power, but it would have taken much longer to become the
world’s only dominant power.
Nations guard their secret alliances with
all the powers they command. German complicity in the Bolshevik rise to power is
widely denied to this day, both in Germany and in post-Communist Russia.
Americans will not accept that their government engaged in intense collaboration
with Soviet Russia, except to defeat fascist Germany.
Everything that appears to be collaboration is attributed to coincidence. The
pattern of mutual benefit, at the expense of all other nations, is dismissed as
European anti-Americanism.
Occasionally, though, a ray
of truth makes its way through the blanket of disinformation. An Alger Hiss is
caught red-handed transmitting State Department secrets to Soviet military
intelligence. A Soviet defector falls from a hotel window while under FBI
protection. Whittaker Chambers exposes the entire Soviet intelligence network
and finds himself under
investigation. But these leaks are rare. The real test of the system occurs when
the entire “bodyguard of lies” collapses, as it did when Richard Nixon arranged
the momentous confrontation between Hiss and Chambers. Then the subversive and
the patriot exchange identities in full view of the people. Americans rise up in
indignation. But it is they, the people, who are exposed. The charade is being
conducted for their benefit, and they have been cheated out of their
ignorance.
No comments:
Post a Comment