StatCounter Code

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Fire the Bodyguard - Part One



Fire the Bodyguard
Part One 


Truth, Winston Churchill once famously said, is so precious that she must sometimes be accompanied by a bodyguard of lies. He was speaking, of course, of the role of deception in wartime. But if truth is so precious, then surely, when peace returns, she deserves to travel unprotected by such an unsavory escort.

For a long time, capitalism felt itself besieged by socialist-inspired class war. As result its defenders were obliged to employ the ideological equivalent of Churchill’s “bodyguard.” A propaganda of deception was the result. This propaganda aimed to disarm capitalism’s socialist foes by vindicating the system against charges which, whether or not they were true, posed significant dangers by mobilizing mass opposition to big business, the free market, private property, and other hallmarks of capitalist enterprise. Just because of the demagogic appeal which these charges possessed, it was necessary in many cases to deny their validity, even when they were in fact true, or at least truer than the propaganda would admit.

The problem with deception as a strategy is that it can often disarm its promoters along with its targets. Lies grow legs and generate intellectual confusion, leading to gross errors in the thinking and often actual practice of the liars. Capitalism once may have needed its “bodyguard of lies” for self-defense against socialism’s attacks. But no such need now exists. The socialist movement everywhere is ruined. So why keep the bodyguard on wages? He is costing more than he is worth.

Take for example the large-scale unemployment, and consequent impoverishment, that the recent financial crisis has inflicted on the working classes of the industrialized world. Most pro-capitalist propaganda accepts the liberal-socialist conventional wisdom that these are bad things, but argues that they are not intrinsic to capitalism and are instead mere anomalies, or the result of too much government meddling in the free market system.

But the truth is that they are good things, not bad, so all the arguments predicated on them being bad things are inherently false.

They are good because of the factual reality that workers are lazy and would prefer to be paid not to work. If they can’t make enough money to lead decent lives while not working, then they will work, but they will strive energetically (indeed, one of the few things they will do energetically) to convert their workplaces into pseudo-work places. In the absence of countervailing forces, they will do this by organizing themselves into trade unions and threatening strikes, and by mobilizing their voting power to enact laws to raise their wages, guarantee their job security, and reduce their workloads.

Capitalism’s way of counteracting these featherbedding techniques by the workers is mass unemployment. Unemployment creates economic conditions in which those desperate for any job at all compete in the employment market against those who already have jobs. The effect of course is to drive down wages and push up worker productivity – in other words, a sure-fire tonic against worker laziness.

A certain amount of unemployment must always be maintained for the sake of worker discipline. But a steep rise in unemployment is a sure sign that endemic worker laziness has become systemically intolerable and must be restrained by extraordinary means – usually a financial crisis, a recession, or in truly severe cases, a depression.

These simple economic facts are not new discoveries. They have simply been obscured by the “bodyguard.” But no enemy means no need for bodyguards. The truth that workers are lazy and shiftless unless whipped into shape by external force – ultimately, by the threat of starvation – is neither shameful nor self-serving. It is not shameful because without the necessary discipline, the world’s working masses would remain sunk in the slough of peasant sloth and brutality in which they subsisted for so many thousands of years before capitalism came long to rescue them. And it is not self-serving because such discipline benefits the whole world, not just the capitalists and their workers. All of history testifies to this. Especially recent history, which has witnessed the ignominious disintegration of capitalism’s only serious challenger – socialism.

So fire the bodyguard and tell the truth! It will pay dividends.